Diablo Immortal is not nearly much worse from DonnaStella's blog

Loot drops are less impactful while character progression is Diablo IV Gold  artificially slowed and scattered across too many systems and are too sluggish and too granular. The game has been better concealed than when Diablo 3 was launched. Diablo 3, but it's also a tedious grind. Buying a battle pass or spending huge amounts on legendary crests won't do much since paying for an amazing item drop won't be as exciting than just getting it.

I'm unsure if there is a way of separating the essence of what makes Diablo enjoyable from the mechanics of free-to-play commercialization. If there is, Blizzard and NetEase have not yet found it. They've come up with a mobile Diablo that is slick pleasant, fun, and quite generous at first. However, if you've spent enough time playing, you'll realize that the core of the game is missing to pieces, then chopped up and returned to you in pieces.

Diablo Immortal is not nearly much worse than a free-to play Diablo could have been. The game will slash you every turn with thousands of microtransactions that come in all kinds of unfathomable currencies. It is necessary to grind your way to win particularly if you opt not to spend money on the game. And your reward for all it is a more flims than the original, reheated version Diablo II's narrative.

And yet, for all its faults, I ultimately enjoyed Diablo Immortal more than I hated it. It's got all the things that make the series enjoyable including its action-packed gameplay, endless customization of characters as  Diablo 4 buy Gold well as its incredible sense of settingand the endless stream of intriguing loot. Indeed, Diablo Immortal even has several clever gameplay tricks that I hope Blizzard keeps in place in Diablo IV.